The sports world
Friday, October 29, 2010
Carlitos' Way
Carlitos' Way.
ED cannot help but think that Carlos Tevez's reported homesickness may have been averted had he bothered to learn English.
Fluent English-speaker Roque Santa Cruz spoke of his Manchester City team-mate's desire to be reunited with his family in Buenos Aires, saying he would not be surprised if the Argentina striker moved home soon.
Tevez is a player who divides opinion.
When a player divides opinion it is either because he is thought of as being bad but actually is not bad, or thought of as being good but is actually not good.
In the former category you have the Darren Fletchers of this world, unheralded and often mocked but important to the team, more so for the less obvious attributes such as teamwork and decision-making than for skill or pace.
In the latter category you have the entire England team, hyped through qualifiers but - with the exception of the implausibly-hated Ashley Cole - not quite up to the task when it really counts.
There is a third category of 'player who divides opinion', a category Tevez comes into.
It is the type of player who - when playing for their team - fans genuinely believe is one of them, someone who gives as much for the shirt as they would, working tirelessly on the pitch and wearing his heart on his sleeve.
But he is the type of player who - in reality - cares little for his club, the city or even the fans, knowing it is just another richly-rewarding stop-gap in his quest for an early retirement to the beach.
Neutrals or fans of other clubs - particularly those he has played for in the past - can often see this. Sometimes, as fans of City's nearest rivals will testify, even the club's own fans will take note.
Tevez constantly raises his profile and worth to a club and its fans with his unquestionable behaviour on the pitch.
But he always lowers expectations with his behaviour off it, creating drama with experienced, proven coaches, leaving enough uncertainty and speculation to pave the way for his next move.
If he is not questioning his use as a secondary striker (as he did at Old Trafford), he is questioning the gaffer's training methods or disappearing off to Argentina (as he has done at Eastlands).
Tevez has lived in London and Manchester and, while his clubs past and present boast some Spanish speakers, training-ground and pitch-side instructions will have been bellowed in English.
For four-and-a-half years Tevez has been living and working in England, in an English-speaking environment. He is a rich man, who can afford several hours of high-quality lessons each day, and who even has fellow Argentine co-workers offering to help.
But he still cannot master the basics of the language. He has admitted as much himself, and recently appeared in an ad for Pepsi using the selling-point that 'this promotion is so easy to explain even Tevez can do it in English'.
David Beckham hardly covered himself in Castilian glory but he at least tried - heck, it took him close to a decade to become comfortable speaking English in public. And ED has nothing but contempt for the breed of Costa-dwelling Brits for whom Spanish extends to the demand for a beer with their fish and chips.
But Carlos Tevez is not inarticulate and he is certainly not stupid.
Interviews in his native tongue are often outspoken and amusing, and he is canny enough to know how to keep fans on side yet maintain enough distance with his club that his inevitable exit is not unexpected.
For a Spanish speaker resident in the UK, one year of failing to reach a basic level of a relatively straightforward language such as English can be seen as unfortunate; a second year could be seen as careless; a third year is just downright rude.
Tevez has far exceeded that.
One cannot help but think that an underlying communication problem may be the root cause of his continued disagreements with his employers, and similarly with his constant craving to return to his homeland.
But all the evidence points to the belief that Tevez doesn't care. He was never in it for the long haul, so why bother?
Pacquiao's retirement talk jeopardises prospect of Mayweather fight
Pacquiao's retirement talk jeopardises prospect of Mayweather fight
Manny Pacquiao’s legendary trainer, Freddie Roach, has revealed that the boxing superstar will not remain in the fight game for long.
he seven-weight world champion has been elected to congress in his native Philippines and Roach concedes that politics will soon overtake boxing in his charges priorities. “We are going to lose Manny Pacquiao to politics, for sure,” Roach told the BBC.
“After the first couple of days of training Manny came up to me and said 'I miss my job', and I said 'you're at your job', and he said 'no, I miss Congress'.”
Pacquiao fights Antonio Margarito on November 13 though nothing is pencilled in after that.
Talk of his retirement will increase the pressure on rival Floyd Mayweather to agree what many believe would be the fight of the century between him and Pacquiao or risk having his legacy tainted by refusing to fight his biggest rival.
HERE YOU GET ALL THE LASTEST NEWS AND COMMENT ON SPORTS..
As FIFA try to calm the goal-line technology controversy, UEFA's president has stepped in to stir it all up again.-----------------------------------------------------These beaks sell-out the punters, they kowtow to Coca Cola, they out-price the big tournaments, they worship the soulless minted tourist that treat every World Cup finals in the same spoiled, unfeeling way he treats the Monaco Grand Prix, Wimbledon, Ascot or the flippin' Glastonbury festival and they continually ignore common sense and the common man in favour of clinging onto the udders of every cash cow they can clamp their sleazy, expensively bejewelled hands on.
Yes indeed. Yes. Point made methinks. The game's "governing bodies" have have done little to earn that epithet over the decades. So, although we're usually the ones to suffer, and the men in national association blazer badges have more brass in their necks than an ornamental giraffe, it's always good to see FIFA and UEFA embarrassed.
Especially if that embarrassment takes place in the two most brutal ways possible: with perfect comic timing and in front of thousands of fans
Last season, 6th March 2010, on the day - the VERY DAY - FIFA declared goal-line technology was, for them and therefore us, a no-go, there arrived a perfect example of just how momentously stupid a decision that was. The event arrived behind the decree with the punctuality of a distinctly fastidious Teuton.
Within what felt like seconds of The International Football Association Board's official announcement that they had no plans to pursue the use of video evidence for goal-line decisions, Birmingham City were not awarded an FA Cup goal at Portsmouth when good old-fashioned TV cameras clearly demonstrated that big, white ball thing had gone beyond the big white line thing and stayed between the three big white stick things.
Two teams from the biggest league in the world, playing in the oldest competition in the world, under the gaze of around a dozen state-of-the-art video-recording machines - at least one of which was dead-on the goal-line whence that football crossed undetected by officialdom.
Comic genius. The game was being beamed out live around the country and so the hundreds of thousands watching in their armchairs knew Birmingam had scored.
Football grounds being as full of TV monitors as they are these days - even grounds as old as Fratton Park now have television in every concourse and corporate box - there should have been thousands in the four stands of the venue who also knew Alex McLeish's side had been denied a stone-wall goal. Everyone except the match officials at Portsmouth knew it.